You have to register before you can post. To keep this forum out of spammers, every registration is manually approved.
If you know answers on any questions on this forum, please feel free to answer them. (PS: I try to answer at least once a week or when possible, - Robert)
I have a 3D model generated from an other project so just to make it easier and faster I'd like to use 3D models to check it. However I don't skip double checking in datasheets of the highest components and connectors. Principle of limited trust
You have a good idea with placing fiducial to verify the spacing, thanks!
How would you have done it in the time when there was no 3D?
Anyhow, you could place a special component, like a fiducial on the places where such collision would occur and have there a little component spacing - ie 0.01mm. You may need to add such small 3D object to the footprint.
WhoKnewKnows When I'm testing a rule I always put it on top in priority list to check if it is working
robertferanec That's a trick I like using. But it doesn't work with PCB in this case. Click on PCB and... nothing happens I guess it is associated with Selection Filter, but PCB is not included even in "Other".
I have never used these kind of rules, so it will be interesting to see what you will come up with.
PS: When I am not sure what rule to use, it is super useful to try to build a rule based on "Find similar objects ..." command. Maybe it can help? https://youtu.be/w9gxB6XVHnk
Hi!
In one of my current projects I need to match board-to-board connectors with an external PCB.
I imported this external PCB as step model and placed it in the desired position.
Now I see Component Clearance DRC between connector P4 and step. This is true for some other connectors too.
Any ideas how could I resolve this? I need a rule for Component Clearance that allows me to have 0 mm clearance between P4 and PCB1R5b step. But I don't know what expressions should be used.
Leave a comment: