Hello,
After placing all components and some RAM routing I wanted to make sure the stackup config that came with the lessons was achievable. So I asked Exception PCB Solutions (same manufacturer) but the guy said;
"Thank you for your quick feedback but I am sorry, it is very risky option to go with the current stack up as the microvias 2-3 drilled at 0.1mm through 0.11mm dielectric is not liable option as this exceed our plating aspect ratio for blind vias : 0.8 :1. The consequence is high probability of voids inside of microvias after plating.
For that reason, I cannot meet the current stack up which provided by my colleague in 2013."
The stackup that he suggested comes with different via hole and track sizes, see attached 2017 version. Would this make my design harder and should I push for a different manufacturer with higher microvia aspect ratio? Or should I go with this stackup?
After placing all components and some RAM routing I wanted to make sure the stackup config that came with the lessons was achievable. So I asked Exception PCB Solutions (same manufacturer) but the guy said;
"Thank you for your quick feedback but I am sorry, it is very risky option to go with the current stack up as the microvias 2-3 drilled at 0.1mm through 0.11mm dielectric is not liable option as this exceed our plating aspect ratio for blind vias : 0.8 :1. The consequence is high probability of voids inside of microvias after plating.
For that reason, I cannot meet the current stack up which provided by my colleague in 2013."
The stackup that he suggested comes with different via hole and track sizes, see attached 2017 version. Would this make my design harder and should I push for a different manufacturer with higher microvia aspect ratio? Or should I go with this stackup?
Comment