Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

StackUP Design

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • electron
    replied
    Thank you Robert for your valuable time & info.

    Leave a comment:


  • robertferanec
    replied
    yes, I try to have individual signals of differential pairs routed with 50OHM impedance (or close to it as it is not always possible). Maybe this can help: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QG0Apol-oj0

    Leave a comment:


  • electron
    replied
    Hi Robert,
    Can you refer any documentation regarding this topic?
    Do you follow this rule in your design practice?

    ​​​​​

    Leave a comment:


  • electron
    replied
    Oh, Yes.
    That answered my question.
    Good to know
    Thanks Robert.

    Leave a comment:


  • robertferanec
    replied
    Many times, differential pairs are just like two single ended tracks - just running opposite signals. So, when routing diff pairs, often you may want to follow the recommended single ended impedance (e,g, 50-55 OHMS) for negative and positive tracks, but together they should follow recommended differential pair impedance e.g. Differential 100 OHMS, Differential 90 OHMS, etc ... Is that answering your question?

    Leave a comment:


  • electron
    started a topic StackUP Design

    StackUP Design

    Hi Robert,

    I watched your video on YouTube published on 25 June 2020 ,regarding Application Note of Intel Altera FPGA.

    I have question about StackUP In Figure 11. Of that application note.

    Why they matched trace width of single ended & differential trace width ?

    Is it necessary ? What's the reason behind it ?

    Please see attached image of that figure.
Working...
X
😀
🥰
🤢
😎
😡
👍
👎